On Thursday, April 17, 2025, a request from the Lamb County District Attorney’s office, that the court dismiss the criminal action against Desirae Marie Mejia, for the reason: “Plea Bargain – plea in another case/count (CC-2023-CR2948, Lubbock County).”
The judge’s order of dismissal states: “The foregoing motion having been presented to me on April 17, 2025, and the same having been considered, it is, therefore Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above styled and numbered case be and the same is hereby Dismissed.
On Thursday, April 17, 2025, a request from the Lamb County District Attorney’s office, that the court dismiss the criminal action against Michelle Lynn Nichols, for the reason: “It best serves the interests of Justice.” The judge’s order of dismissal states: “The foregoing motion having been presented to me on April 17, 2025, and the same having been considered, it is, therefore Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above styled and numbered case be and the same is hereby Dismissed.
On Thursday, April 17, 2025, a request from the Lamb County District Attorney’s office, that the court dismiss the criminal action against Michelle Lynn Nichols, for the reason: “It best serves the interests of Justice.” The judge’s order of dismissal states: “The foregoing motion having been presented to me on April 17, 2025, and the same having been considered, it is, therefore Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above styled and numbered case be and the same is hereby Dismissed.
On Thursday, May 1, 2025, a request from the Lamb County District Attorney’s office, that the court dismiss the criminal action against Orlando Vasquez Delafuente, for the reason: “It best serves the interests of Justice.”
The judge’s order of dismissal states: “The foregoing motion having been presented to me on May 1, 2025, and the same having been considered, it is, therefore Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the above styled and numbered case be and the same is hereby Dismissed.
Discharging Supervision
On Wednesday, April 30, 2025, a request from the District Attorney’s office about a case on Raymundo Longoria-Carillo, the judge’s response was: “On this the 30th day of April 2025, came on to be considered the matter of determining whether or not the finding heretofore entered in this cause against the defendant, Raymundo Longoria-Carillo, should be set aside and the defendant discharged from Community Supervision, and it appearing to the Court that said the defendant did, on the 1st day of May, 2023, plead Guilty to the misdemeanor offense of Driving While Intoxicated, and further proceedings having been suspended under conditions of Community Supervision for a term of two (2) years; and “It further appearing to the Court that the defendant has completed all of the original supervision period, with all conditions of Community Supervision having been satisfactorily fulfilled; “It is therefore ordered that the community supervision of Raymundo Longoria-Carillo, is terminated and he is discharged there from.”
On Wednesday, April 30, 2025, a request from the District Attorney’s office about a case on Kristi Nicole Lemer, the judge’s response was: “On this the 30th day of April 2025, came on to be considered the matter of determining whether or not the finding heretofore entered in this cause against the defendant, Kristi Nicole Lemer, should be set aside and the defendant discharged from Community Supervision, and it appearing to the Court that said the defendant did, on the 1st day of May, 2023, plead Guilty to the misdemeanor offense of Driving While Intoxicated BAC >=0.15, and further proceedings having been suspended under conditions of Community Supervision for a term of two (2) years; and “It further appearing to the Court that the defendant has completed all of the original supervision period, with all conditions of Community Supervision having been satisfactorily fulfilled; “It is therefore ordered that the community supervision of Kristi Nicole Lemer, is terminated and he is discharged there from.”
On Tuesday, May 6, 2025, a request from the District Attorney’s office about a case on Ethan Rodriguez, the judge’s response was: “On this the 6th day of May 2025, came on to be considered the matter of determining whether or not the finding heretofore entered in this cause against the defendant, Ethan Rodriguez, should be set aside and the defendant discharged from Community Supervision, and it appearing to the Court that said the defendant did, on the 25th day of May, 2022, plead Guilty to the misdemeanor offense of Possession of Marij<2oz, and further proceedings having been suspended under conditions of Community Supervision for a term of two (2) years; and “It further appearing to the Court that the defendant has completed all of the original supervision period, with all conditions of Community Supervision having been satisfactorily fulfilled; “It is therefore ordered that the community supervision of Ethan Rodriguez, is terminated and he is discharged there from.”
Order Discharging Defendant from Community Supervision for Deferred Adjudication On this the 5th day of May, 2025, came on to be considered the matter determining whether or not the finding heretofore entered in this cause against the Defendant, Crystal Ortiz, should be set aside and said Defendant discharged from Community Supervision, and it appearing to the Court that said Defendant did, on the 6th day of May 2024, plead Guilty to the misdemeanor offense of Assault Causes Bodily Injury Family Member, and adjudication of the prosecution against her was defered under conditions of Community Supervision for a term of One (1) year; and If further appears to the Court that the Defendant has completed all of the original supervision period, with all conditions of Community Supervision having been satisfactorily fulfilled: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court that the Defendant’s plea of Guilty and ensuing Community Supervision under deferred adjudication heretofore granted to the Defendant, Crystal Ortiz, be and the same hereby set aside, and the charge against the Defendant is hereby dismissed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court that the Defendant, Crystal Ortiz, be and she is hereby released and discharged from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the crime or offense of which she has been granted Community Supervision under deferred adjudication, except that proof of said plea shall be known to the Court should the Defendant be convicted of any criminal offense.
Order of Dismmissal on Deferred Adjudication
On May 5, 2025, the Assistant County Attorney of Lamb County, Texas and respectfully requests this Court to dismiss the above styled and numbered cause for the reason that defendant successfully completed the term of probation ordered by the Court in said Cause.
Wherefore Premises Considered the undersigned prays for an order of dismissal of the above cause.
The Judge’s order of dismissal states: “On this the 5th day of May, A.D. 2025, came on to be heard and considered the motion of the Assistant County Attorney of Lamb County, Texas to dismiss the above styled and numbered Cause, and it appearing that such motion should be granted, it is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed by the court that the above styled and numbered Cause be dismissed, and that the defendant, Crystal Ortiz, be discharged.”